<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>raptures of folly &#187; unworty effigies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://folly.dk/blog/category/fiddling-with-pics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://folly.dk/blog</link>
	<description>blogitus ergo sum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:32:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>sneak preview</title>
		<link>http://folly.dk/blog/2007/07/12/sneak-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://folly.dk/blog/2007/07/12/sneak-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[unworty effigies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://folly.dk/blog/2007/07/12/sneak-preview/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
(click to enlarge)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://folly.dk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/wedding-preview-big.jpg' title='peek'><img src='http://folly.dk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/wedding-preview-big.thumbnail.jpg' alt='peek' /></a><br />
(click to enlarge)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://folly.dk/blog/2007/07/12/sneak-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jane &#8211; at last!</title>
		<link>http://folly.dk/blog/2006/10/09/jane-at-last/</link>
		<comments>http://folly.dk/blog/2006/10/09/jane-at-last/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dastardly verbalizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unworty effigies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://folly.dk/blog/2006/10/09/jane-at-last/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three cheers for BBC&#8217;s new production, Jane Eyre &#8211; on (at the very least) for every broadcasted episode so far. Well, that might be a bit far fetched as I couldn&#8217;t really warm up for anything in episode one (was very tempted to call i a major let-down) but the next two episodes made up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://folly.dk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/jane-eyre-2006-avatar.png' title='jane-eyre-2006-avatar.png'><img src='http://folly.dk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/jane-eyre-2006-avatar.thumbnail.png' alt='jane-eyre-2006-avatar.png' align="right" /></a>Three cheers for BBC&#8217;s new production, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/janeeyre/">Jane Eyre</a> &#8211; on (at the very least) for every broadcasted episode so far. Well, that might be a bit far fetched as I couldn&#8217;t really warm up for anything in <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/janeeyre/episodeguide_episode1.shtml">episode one</a> (was very tempted to call i a major let-down) but the next two episodes made up for that flaws of the first&#8230; big time! I wouldn&#8217; go as far as to call it my favourite ever (since the novel isn&#8217;t one of my favs either) but it&#8217;s definitely getting close (btw: the picture on the right is not yours. Do not claim it as such.).</p>
<p>***SPOILERS*** (stop reading here in case you haven&#8217;t watched the adaption/read the novel):<br />
The rushed childhood might be called a first lapse but to be honest, I never cared about that part of the novel anyway. I rather considered it be a smart approach to a not so attractive part of the novel. Nevertheless, every good thing was missing and especially Jane&#8217;s relationship with Helen was reduced so much that some parts of her character later in life and even the naming of Helen later on seems out of the blue, I think. Plus: Was that an altar she was lying on? But then, Thornfield &#8211; at last. It took me quite a while to adapt to both, Ruth Wilson and Toby Stevens &#8211; her mouth reminded me just too much of a guy (!) I went to school with and his flirty-girty appearance was just over the top. Another reason for my dislike was the sheer overkill of hand-held shots. It&#8217;s great that they tried a more modern approach to filming a periode movie but thought it overdone for the most time and distracting rather than intruiging. It seemed a bit film-student trying to be innovative and reminded of Dogma95 movies. </p>
<p>Then <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/janeeyre/episodeguide_episode2.shtml">part 2</a> came, I had made my peace with RW&#8217;s face and TS&#8217;s smiles and *PANG!* &#8211; I was lost. Especially RW&#8217;s performance was simply great and even if I will never seriously fancy the man so do I still have to admit that TD&#8217;s Rochester is growing on me. The only scene I wasn&#8217;t happy with in this episode was the money-for-the-journey scene &#8211; it&#8217;s one of my all time favourite moments in literature (together with the letter from Persuasion, the funeral from Holly and others) and I lovelovelove it in the <a href="http://folly.dk/blog/2006/08/08/costume-drama-review-part-ii/">ZC/TD adaption</a> and this adaption lacked all the spark, I found. I so missed Timothy Dalton shouting &#8220;you shall walk up the pyramides of Egypt!&#8230;. you little niggard!&#8221; &#8211; Wonderful! Even if I can understand why they changed a lot of the original lines, to exclude these lines sure was a blunder! Click <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXAknZi5970">here</a> to see how RW and TS managed this scene.</p>
<p>Now finally, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/janeeyre/episodeguide_episode3.shtml">episode 3</a> was aired last night and I can&#8217;t help the big huge grin Mr Lovedrunk has planted onto my face&#8230; Seriously, I&#8217;ve never seen anything like it and TS was too cute. I was giggling all the way through their getting together, the first kisses, the hand in the carriage, the &#8220;that child knows you better than I do&#8221; &#8211; lovely! TS starts filling Rochester&#8217;s larger-than-life pants and I&#8217;m thrilled to watch him doing so. As for RW, I can&#8217;t think of anything more to say that she just might have pushed ZC off the little thrown I&#8217;ve had built in her honour&#8230; there&#8217;s never been a more genuine portrayal of JE than hers. I laugh with her and suffer with her and can&#8217;t wait to see her struggle next time &#8211; Click <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0jFPUfPeig">here</a> for a clip of the crucial scene in this episode. What a pity that they seem to have chosen to skip the taking-off scene! We&#8217;ll have to do without it then&#8230; if only it&#8217;d be Sunday already! Alas, there&#8217;s still a lot to rewatch (for instance a clip from the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/janeeyre/episodeguide_episode4.shtml">final episode</a>) and rediscuss on <a href="http://c19.proboards53.com/index.cgi?board=eyre">C19</a> and reread on <a href="http://pennyforyourdreams.blogspot.com/">Penny For Your Dream</a> and <a href="http://bronteana.blogspot.com/">Brontëana</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://folly.dk/blog/2006/10/09/jane-at-last/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrh</title>
		<link>http://folly.dk/blog/2006/06/29/grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrh/</link>
		<comments>http://folly.dk/blog/2006/06/29/grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[unworty effigies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://folly.dk/blog/2006/06/29/grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today was a rather cr*appy one&#8230; What a wonder would a wee bit of sun do to this country where people run around in their shorts and skirts because the calendar says it summer! Well, nevermind. I&#8217;m happy enough whenever the rain takes a break. Anyway, today&#8217;s worry wasn&#8217;t the weather anyhow. It was those [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today was a rather cr*appy one&#8230; What a wonder would a wee bit of sun do to this country where people run around in their shorts and skirts because the calendar says it summer! Well, nevermind. I&#8217;m happy enough whenever the rain takes a break. Anyway, today&#8217;s worry wasn&#8217;t the weather anyhow. It was those bl*sted people that crafted this editor! Would anybody please go and throw a bomb into their place? &#8211; Or you know what: <strong>Take a waterproof marker and write some random text on their screens!!!</strong>&#8230; to erase that must be about as tiring a process as it was for me today to set up some pictures in a new section&#8230; what are they? Bl**dy numpties? Seriously, if I ever see an extra, non-needed, non-put, non-wanted emphasize or paragraph or whatever else tag in the HTML-code, I&#8217;ll scream&#8230; I will!</p>
<p>Btw: If you want to see what killed my last nerves this afternoon, have a look at the <em><a title="Duddles" href="http://folly.dk/blog/doodle/">Duddle</a>-</em>section &#8211; hence the <em>unworthy effigies</em>-tag on this post <img src='http://folly.dk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://folly.dk/blog/2006/06/29/grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
